Conversation Changes

After last week’s post, I was very pleased with the kind of variation in styles of speaking I was getting, but something just didn’t feel quite right. It took a bit of time and quite a bit of feedback to figure out what it was, and that then triggered a second realisation about something else that needed changing, and in turn, a third. And a fourth and a fifth!

First, length and clauses. Many of these are simply too long, and there are too many additional clauses. I think the extra clauses will become just a little bit annoying after a certain point, especially if you’re talking to lots of people from one civilization close together. As such, I’ve made some sentences shorter, and reduced the likelihood of clauses being added to sentences. This also meant a change to sentence complexity: I’ve decided to actually make quite a substantial change here and change sentence complexity from a value/modifier embodied in a civilization to a value embodied individually in each person you encounter. I realized that since you’ll spend a decent length of time in each nation at once, you’re probably going to be spending a while talking to a range of people from the same background, and so I want to boost variation between people more than I want to boost variation between civilizations. As a result, each person now has a sentence complexity modifier specific to them. This has five variations, which I’m currently just storing as 1-5; that’s an x/15 chance that each sentence they say might have a clause. This means even the most wordy person will add in extra detail clauses in 1/3 sentences, but for most it will be far rarer. I’ve tried this out a little and I’m much happier with the kinds of sentences it produces (along with the other changes). Equally, it means that that kind of extra info will come to the player more gradually, which I think is also beneficial.

Secondly, punctuation. The end of sentences now varies according to the mood of the person speaking them; a hostile NPC will end with “.” or “…” to everything they say, a neutral NPC will end with “.”, whilst an NPC very positively disposed towards you will end sentences with a mix of “.” and “!”. Again, a very simple thing, but it’s already making a big different to the ebb and flow of conversation.

Thirdly, and related to the above – formality. Many of the sentences were just too formal and rigid and didn’t have the kind of flow that you would expect sentences to have. To adjust this, I’ve made some changes to quite a few of the sentences, added in the possibility for things like “Hmm…” to appear at the start of sentences, or things like “Let me think”, or “That’s hard to remember”, or “I don’t know much, but I’ll tell you what I recall”, things like that – I’ve also added in more use of “I’m” instead of “I am”, “I’ve” instead of “I have”, etc, and so on. The combination of these various alterations seems to be working quite nicely, and gives a far more conversational feel to the whole thing.

Fourthly, visuals. I felt that using the skin tone for the sentences on both sides of the conversation is making the actual conversation window look a bit too thick and same-y; instead, the player’s comments will always be the same colour as their @ symbol, i.e. white, whilst those from other characters will change according to skin tone. This breaks up the visuals and seems to make conversations a little easier to parse, which is obviously very important!

Fifthly, stories – see below in the example for precisely what I mean by that.

As such, this is how conversations should look from this point onwards:


There’s still a lot more to be done, of course – like adding “Hmm…” and all the other stuff described above, but I think this is a great step forward.

More next week!

A Million Ways to Speak in the World

Firstly, rather excitingly, I’ve been commissioned to write a four-part series on qualitative procedural generation for Rock Paper Shotgun! Societies, practices, cultures, beliefs, and so forth, and how to integrate them into gameplay. I think one part will be going up each fortnight for the next three fortnights, but here’s the first one.


Generation Next, Part 1: How Games Can Benefit From Procedurally Generated Lore

Sentence Generation

This week I’ve been adding in a truly titanic amount of speech variation into the game. I’m only now beginning to realize the size and scope of this task, given the level of variety and interest and complexity I want to include, but at this point it’s close to around ~1/3rd of the default conversation options done. There’s a vast number of archetypes, a truly gigantic number of clauses and descriptive modifiers (a comment a character might make about the word “world” if they’re from a particularly isolationist nation, for instance, which might be something like “frightening in its size and distances”). I’ve already written several thousand of lines of speech, variations in those, templates, words, clauses, kennings, all kinds of stuff, and written the (actually remarkably simple) code that pieces them all together. I’ve reached the end of all the “default” questions which you can ask anyone (and their answers), and I’m now moving onto the class-specific questions (and their answers), and then after that onto the special answers that change their sentence structure, not just their sentence content, depending on the NPC. By this I mean, you can always answer the question “What is your religion’s most sacred relic?” with an answer of the sort “Our most sacred relic is [x]”. However, a question like “What is your opinion about the ongoing war?” cannot be answered with a single sentence with words switched out, so needs a more complex set of answers tethered to the opinions of that NPC.

There basically hasn’t been much new coding going on since last time, so below you’ll find two conversations I had with different people, and how different they turned out (so the same kind of thing I showed off last week). You’ll notice that certain words get “expanded” upon, such as that “in which we all serve and are served” bit of the first picture below; these are bits of flavour text heavily dependent of course upon religions, cultures, backgrounds, etc, and these are one of the major things that will give you a hint about the background of the person, when they elect to give you a bit of their perspective on an issue you’re discussing. By the end of this process there will be an *incredible* number of these little expansions; as above, I’ve only done about 1/3rd of the default conversation options so far (not to mention negative replies, replies that can’t have a default form, and other stuff) and already there are several hundred of these. Naturally some political beliefs are easier to find expansions for – consider how much of a conversation someone from a pacifist nation would comment on, compared to how much of a conversation someone from a planned economy nation would have a comment relevant to planned economy to make – but I’m trying to come up with expansions for even the less-obvious ideologies too.

Anyway, here’s two examples of one conversation again, and you can see these are already more complex than last week:
New Conversation 1_1

New Conversation 1_2

I love how distinctive these are, and how you can even in just a few snippets of conversation start to guess at some of the beliefs and backgrounds of the people and their nations. In that last one you can see that we need a scroll bar for the conversation window, which is coming shortly.

For next time, I’ll be continuing to put in the massive databases that underlie the sentence generation system. I’m also starting to put in the first parts of two next things, both designed to enhance the smoothness and realism of the conversation system, instead of reducing it to what can look like a question-and-answer session. Although I’m super-proud of the above screenshots, they ARE quite question-and-answery, and this needs to be changed, and that’s what these two new elements will help us towards (the “how interested am I in this conversation” meter will be coming later). These two new elements are:

  • Counter Questions: this is what I’m calling it when the character you’re talking to asks you something back! They’ll reply (or not) to your question, and then ask you a question back; sometimes the same question, sometimes a related question, and sometimes a more general “Why are you asking that”, “Why do you want to know?”, etc. You’ll then get a reply option (see below) that you can use, or not, depending on your preference.
  • Replies: you as the player can respond to a specific thing that another character said and question them further on a topic that emerges in the process of conversation. For instance, if they mention a person, you can immediately say “Can you tell me more about [person]”, if you want to. Alternatively, as above, you can offer replies to what someone asks you, and will have the option to tell the truth, lie, semi-lie, etc.

These do require a bit of work, and I want to get all the “default” stuff done first, so I won’t mention these for another week or two, but I wanted to note that I’m aware the structure and flow of conversations needs a little work, and I’ll be working on that soon.

See you all next week!

UPDATE: various bits of feedback have highlighted some other issues with how conversations are currently looking, basically focused around their excessive formality. Like I say, I’m working on it, but I’ve also identified a few other useful changes I can make before next week…

Seeing Names, Changing Dialect, Sentence Generation

Since last week we had a post about my third bullet hell world record high score instead of an URRpdate, this week’s should be the longest in quite some time! Lots has happened in terms of naming NPCs, fixing remaining bugs, changing the player’s dialect in a conversation, and also sentence generation is now actually happening! Most exciting. Read on…


…but wait! One tangential thing first. A while ago a URR fan made a URR Wikipedia page, which can be found here. I’m very happy with how the page looks, and I see it expanding soon with the release of 0.8 and several books and book chapters coming out in the near future (written by me, and by others) that discuss URR, but that label at the top has been there for some time. Naturally, as the game’s developer, I have an obvious conflict of interest, but for those of you who read the blog and are Wikipedians – if you, in your neutral opinion, think the article is good enough to have the banner removed, is there a process for this? Or with some more references added if that’s what it needs? If someone feels it can be taken down, or can give me advice on what I might need to add, that would be fantastic. I get a substantial amount of traffic from the Wikipedia page so I want to ensure it’s as high a quality as possible. And, of course, it’s a very pleasing mark of legitimacy/relevance to have a Wikipedia page, so it definitely matters to me that the page represents the game well and “deserves” its place on Wikipedia.


Names in Conversations

As well as being generated, names now appear correctly in conversations. In future versions you will naturally not automatically know the names of strangers you bump into – unlike certain RPGs we could mention where the player magically divines the names of every single you talk to – and learning someone’s name will therefore sometimes be a gameplay mechanic. You might, for instance, know that a particular merchant called [Name] knows something, but the civilization that merchant comes from are not particular friendly to you, and you don’t know what they sell, so you’ll have to try to figure out which of seven merchants in a market district the particular merchant you’re after is, and potentially use other clues (sex, clothing, behaviour, whatever). Equally, of course, the game will remember perfectly the names of everyone you meet, and I’m actually thinking of a system that might alert you when you encounter someone whose name you already know – perhaps a message in the text log saying “You see [Name] [doing task X]” for someone you already know, because there is no visual way to mark out someone you recognise from someone you don’t (i.e. two merchants will both be ‘m’ whether you know them or not). Here are a couple of screenshots showing some conversation windows with people from various name-types:

Name1 Name2


Changing Dialect

You can now actually change your dialect by selecting a different dialect. This is a small thing, but it required me to start building up the code for handling what happens when you press [Enter] on an option in an in-conversation window, and it therefore has to detect the sentence or the item or the dialect you select, and then notice what kind of thing it is the player has selected, and then take the appropriate action. This works correctly now, though, so you can switch to another dialect and all the % chances of uttering each possible sentence immediately update appropriately. You can see in this gif how the chances of successful/unsuccessful words changes as we change dialect from one to the other.


Sentence Generation (Part I)

After thinking long and hard about sentence generation, and managing to free up a spare day to do nothing else except working on this, I’ve been able to make a substantial start. So, basically, the game splits sentences down into three categories, I’m naming “clauses“, “archetypes“, and “kennings” (which applies to a range of things that are not technically kennings, but the term gives us a good impression of what we’re talking about here).

Clauses: these are segments of a sentence, which vary massively from culture, religion, geographical background, and all the other factors that basically everything else in URR tends to be varied along.  A sentence will contain several clauses in most cases, and clauses are basically sections of a sentence that the game will generate independently (via archetypes) and then stitch back together (see below for more information on this).

Archetypes: these are hand-written default versions for each possible question. For each of the questions that the player can possibly ask (or the NPC can ask back), I’ve gone through and written a dozen or so variations of that serve as the foundations of possible replies (although once a reply is finished it will be almost indistinguishable from the archetype that created it). These are then distributed to each culture semi-randomly, with some relationships between some archetypes which others are “free-floating”, and each culture then starts the game with a few basic and foundational ways to talk about the things people might need to talk about in-game.

Kennings: in the case of URR, this refers to a particular way of referring to a particular thing. So this might mean referring to historical events, or a title to put in front of the name of a deity, or a particular way to talk about oceans or mountains, and so forth. These are basically segments of clauses that have to be expressed a particular way, so a clause might say [Title of god] and then the game will look up the appropriate “kenning” for that element and place it into the clause; alternatively, if it says [Desert] then maybe that nation says “Deserts”, or “Great Sands”, or “Great Dunes”, or “the Red Expanse”, or whatever, and the game will quickly check what the appropriate (generated) term is for something in a sentence.

So, in trying to create a sentence, the game does the following process:

Stage 1: select clauses. This first stage means that the game looks at how many clauses should be in a sentence, and what they should be. A nation with a dialect with low “sentence complexity” will have very few clauses in the average sentence, for example, whilst a nation with high sentence complexity will have many clauses. I’ve developed a fairly complex but easily-added-to system for adding clauses into sentences based on the nature of the sentence. This means that extra historical, personal, geographical, religious, etc, detail can be added to a sentence depending on how many clauses it has, and those clauses will be handled intelligently and sensibly.

Stage 2: select an archetype for each clause. The game then checks how that particular culture would express a particular clause and retrieves that archetype (which will then, in stage 3, be massively varied) and readies it. Archetypes are generated/selected in such a way that they should be broadly consistent across a culture, so you shouldn’t get a culture that talks about mountains in one way and talks about oceans in another, but rather talks about all those things in a broadly comparable way. Archetypes also affect sentence structure and in some cases word order, and these elements are also taken into account.

Stage 3: implement kennings/references. This third stage is perhaps the most important part of sentence generation, since at this point the game looks up how to express everything in every clause in that sentence. As we see above, archetypes say things like [Religion-title] and these are all triggers, telling the game to look up the appropriate phrase for the appropriate thing in the appropriate culture. As such, the sentences themselves within archetypes tend to have a large volume of square brackets in them, and aren’t really human-readable – although you can get a good idea of their meaning – until there’s a nice lot of kennings and references in place.

Stage 4: stitch it all together. The game then goes through all the sentence components – now transformed from archetypes with square brackets to archetypes with appropriate references and the like – and stitches them together with appropriate punctuation. This is partially done through the system that places clauses together, and also a bunch of signifiers that handle things like vowels/consonants, plurals, etc.

It was very tricky to find a system that struck the right balance between a) generating a huge volume of potential sentences, b) making the number of hand-made sections relatively low so that I actually get the release out before the 2020s, and c) ensuring a huge amount of modular variation within the sentence structures. With this system – selecting clauses, selecting archetypes, varying almost all of the components of those archetypes, and then stitching the sentence together into a meaningful whole – I’m confident that I’ve found a balance between all of these requirements. I think I’ve struck a balance between large volumes of hand-made sections, large volumes of procedurally-generated sections, and sections of speech that sit somewhere in the middle where handmade elements can be altered or twisted in some way depending on the particular nature of the speaker. I’m really excited to see what this will produce! These are just initial trials, but in the coming week I’ll be trying to build up all the possible conversation options and archetypes and clauses and whatnot, and then we’ll see how that looks. Here are two variations OF THE SAME CONVERSATION, and just look at all that variation!



(Note: you’ll also see a tiny bit of procedurally-generated calendars there! Some use years, some use a bunch of other systems; this might not make it into 0.8, but I just happened to be testing it out whilst I took these screenshots)

(You’ll also note the lack of ‘?’ in the second – just a typo!)

Having looked at the power of this system, even with the incredibly simple conversation above, I am *so* excited about how this is going to work. I now just need to write all the other words to slot into every other part of the system, and this is a huge task, but by next week’s blog entry I hope to have it all done and to be able to show off some more detailed conversations, as well as some of the other conversation options I’ve been developing this week – these extra things aren’t totally ready just yet, but they’ll be essential to making conversations feel very human, and adding extra depth.

Next Week

Conversations, sentences!

Blue Wish Resurrection World Record and Analysis

An unexpected blog post this week! Yesterday I managed to achieve my third bullet hell world record to date, this time in the very popular “Blue Wish Resurrection”. Score Rush was quite a substantial shmup in terms of player base, but Danmaku Unlimited 2 was somewhat smaller in its visibility, but this is almost certainly the most visible world record to date, or to put it another way, is probably a game played more than both of my previous two record-games combined. This blog entry is therefore the now-standard world record analysis post, with lots of gifs and the video (just below), and some thoughts about what I’m going to be playing next. Enjoy!

(For those wondering about the next regular URRpdate – that’ll now be next week, and now somewhat larger than it was otherwise going to be).

First Level Optimization (00:15)

The first level only takes a moment to restart if I screw it up, so in the first level you’ll see me really pushing my luck in a bunch of places because there’s very little to lose at this point (and also because I wasn’t really playing for the record yesterday (!), so I was actually probably taking more risks than I usually would anyway). In the gif below you can see me pushing right up against the top of the screen in order to kill things as quickly as possible and open up the “point well” – that thing in the left pillar spewing out golden cubes – as soon as it comes on screen. For the rest of this level I spend almost all my time near the top of the screen, as you get points for the golden cubes enemies drop and they decrease in value the longer they take to pick up, so you’re encouraged to kill things up close. The time I don’t spend at the top of the screen I spend waiting until there are enough bullets on screen to be worth converting into points (when large enemies are killed), or killing enemies at a particular speed/pace to maximize the points I get from them. This was one of the best playthroughs of the first levels I’ve ever had – though not the best ever – but more than adequate to continue with. I think a truly perfect playthrough, however, would be something like 100k points higher.


Second Level Mid-Boss and Boss (03:50 and 06:10)

The second stage has a few slightly tough sections. The mid-boss (shown below) is quite interesting in that it consists of five parts – the main body and four little turrets that directly target the player. When you destroy each of those turrets, the bullets surrounding them (though not on the entire screen) get converted into points cubes, so it became clear I needed to kill this in a sufficiently optimal way that I could get maximum points from these smaller segments. As such, you’ll see here I hug the edge (which is slightly scary) whilst destroying the right-most turret, then destroy the second one when the boss does a “splurge” bullet attack at the exact right time to get a full conversion of those bullets into score cubes, and then (in the video) I kill the other two close up to maximize the bullet conversion there as well.


The second boss (i.e. the boss at the end of the second stage) is has the first attack that I would say is genuinely tough, which is this final attack. It fires bullets in four directions which then fire a range of smaller bullets at an angle that’s very unusual in shmups, as you far more ordinarily get bullets coming straight down, or at least straight at your ship (or where your ship was when the bullets were fired). In addition, these chains of unfurling bullets are then fired directly towards the player’s ship, which makes it harder to stand in one place for two long just moving up and down, which would probably be easiest, and instead gets you to move side to side. I think there was a particular dodge in this boss fight that turned out to be weirdly close, in the end, but this phase went well, and by the end of this phase this playthrough was starting to look pretty decent.


Third Level Boss (08:40)

The stage 3 boss is, to me, the real transition in the game from fairly easy stages to very hard stages – there’s a big spike from the middle of stage 3 (and everything before) to the end of stage 3 (and everything afterwards). The third boss has a particularly difficult final attack, shown in the gif below, in which bullets spawn extra bullets of various sorts, some just spewing madly around the screen and some targeted directly at the player. Trying to “re-stream” – to stop tapping left and start tapping right, or vice versa, and therefore cut across the current line of bullets trailing you – is especially hard in this attack, but I’ve found that moving as slowly as possible both reduces the number of re-streams you have to pull off, and also makes the “wall” of bullets less challenging to break through. It’s still a pretty crazy attack, though, and it’s a real trap for newer players who will always think that moving more is the best way to play these sorts of games.


Fourth Level Mid-Boss Final Attack (12:15)

Not much analysis here, other than to say that the attack below is one of the toughest in the game, I think; it’s very fast, the pink bullets are quite large, the blocks of purple bullets are even larger, and there’s very little relationship between how the two elements are aimed, which makes it basically impossible to rote-learn a way through – in turn, one has to just reflex it every time. Right at the end of this attack I actually took a slight risk, since I expected to have killed it already and I was moving up screen to maximize my points from the subsequent bullet conversion, so almost died! Happily, though, this didn’t happen and the mid-boss did, indeed, expire a second later, but if you watch the video, you’ll see this moment just before the mid-boss explodes.


Fourth Level Boss (13:25)

Whew, Boss 4 is very tough. None of its attacks are trivial, but the two I’ve outlined here are definitely the toughest. This first one has the boss’ four “wheels” spin around it, each of which fires out chains of light bullets in a pattern that also rotates independently of the wheel’s rotation, and spew out a chain of dark purple bullets, and the main part of the boss fires groups of three lines of thin bullets from its middle, its left, and its right (if you watch the gif you’ll be able to see everything I’ve just described). This is a super-difficult attack due to the volume of bullets on screen, the different patterns and trajectories they all follow, the risk of bullet overlap (one bullet being hidden by another bullet) and just the general confusion of the whole thing. This is one of the very, very few parts of the game I actually just learned a precise set of moves for – the game is deterministic, after all, and this attack always looks the same each time as long as the player moves the same way (since many bullets are aimed), and so I managed to figure out a particular sequence that gets me through this nightmare safely.


And then we have this attack, which just looks completely ridiculous until you look more at it… after which it continues to look completely ridiculous. Basically, there are five lines of bullets too dense to move through being fired, and then dozens of lines of bullets being forced from the two sides of the boss at various angles. Navigating this nightmare involves placing yourself between the thick lines and being able to see where the lines of circular bullets with gaps will next be crossing over, and then crossing through them, without letting yourself be squashed against the walls of bullets. This was an attack that continued to give me trouble even as I got close to a world record standard, and it’s easily the hardest attack in the same outside of the final boss… and maybe actually the hardest attack per se? It’s hard to say, but it’s damned tough – and I found it too fast to learn a sequence for, so this is just pure reflex every time I play.


Fifth Level Pre-Boss (18:10)

Before the final boss these two particular enemies spawn, and I’ve always found their attacks weirdly impossible. I think I’ve only cleanly dodged them without losing a life or using a bomb once or twice, and that’s just not consistent enough; however, using a bomb converts all the bullets into score cubes, and with such a large number of score cubes on screen, I realised that it might not actually be the worst idea to use a bomb here deliberately to clear out the screen. You get extra points at the end of the game for each bomb unused, but I’m pretty sure that doing this gives us roughly enough extra points to offset the points lost at the end – and ensures I don’t die!


Fifth Level Boss (19:00)

Ah, the final boss. Considering the final bosses of this game, DU2, and Score Rush, I think this is probably the hardest, though the DU2 final boss is a very close second. The first two phases you’ll see on the video are trivial, but then this (the below gif) phase begins, which is the other phase with a legitimate claim to being the hardest phase in the game (just like the final attack of the Stage 4 boss). This has thick lines of thin pink bullets that constrict the player’s movement to within only a small chevron of the overall space on-screen, combined with massive swirling chains of purple bullets, and a chain of thick purple bullets being “washed” back and forth across the screen from the middle of the boss, and some aimed lines of pink bullets coming from either side of the boss (which, weirdly, are often the toughest part to avoid). It’s pretty rough, and I tried to create a particularly sequence to survive, but again, I found it rather tricky to emulate, so this is mostly reflex with a few small rote-learned elements. A lot of this attack is about making sure you move into the next segment you’re being pushed towards at a particular speed; too slow and the impassable lines of bullets will catch with you and kill you, but too fast and you’ll be stuck waiting around in one area whilst all the aimed lines target and destroy you. It’s a careful balance to strike, and one that took a lot of practice.


There are then three other attacks between the above gif and the below one, both of which are tough and tricky, but doable – this final attack, however, looks like a complete nightmare, but is actually remarkably workable. Basically, the boss is firing the dark purple circular bullets, and those spawn the pink bullet-shaped bullets, and the boss also fires thick lines of pink circles directly at the player. This is one of those attacks where you actually want to move as little as possible; a lot of the bullets drift off the sides, the purple circular shots are few and far between, and the aimed chains of pink circles take quite a while to get to you, so broadly speaking I basically try to slowly drift from one side to another during this phase, and to always choose to take a tiny “gap” between two pink bullets than to make a larger dodge. By moving very little in this attack, therefore, I only really have to focus on the bullets in my immediate vicinity, which move relatively slowly and are very predictable in their movement, and that transforms this completely mad-looking attack into something remarkably doable (believe it or not!).


What next?

Well, that’s a third world record. When I started playing these games I wasn’t really expecting to get more than one, and certainly not in a game as well-known and well-played in the genre as Blue Wish Resurrection, so I’m particularly proud of this one. Naturally, different world records are “worth” different amounts depending on the volume of players, but I don’t know of any Western players who has ever stacked up three world records, two of which are in games that certainly have substantial playerbases. Equally, although I’m getting “older”, I do seem to be accelerating; I played Score Rush for two years before getting the WR, Danmaku Unlimited 2 for a year before getting the WR, and Blue Wish Resurrection for only six months before getting the WR. If this pace continues, another world record will appear before the end of the year… but I don’t think that’s realistically likely, especially as for the next month I’m primarily focused on finishing URR 0.8, I have papers to finish, and an entire book to write, so I wouldn’t expect a fourth WR until some time in 2018. Nevertheless, I will next be pursuing the Hard Mode world record in the excellent and profoundly hectic Cho Ren Sha 68k…


…but first, I’m scheduled to play Blue Wish Resurrection at this year’s FDG/DiGRA conference, so I need to make sure I stay at the top level for just another few weeks until I can discharge that obligation! And then I’ll get onto CRS68k.

See you all next time for a return to standard URRpdates! (And a substantial one, at that, with lots of sentence generation, the conversation system, etc)

Name Implementation, Animals, Plants, Sentence Generation, and Bug Hunt

This week has seen the implementation of name generation into the main game file, to rather fantastic results, alongside a substantial amount of bug-fixing. For name generation, the names now consider all the relevant religious/cultural/geographical background of the nation they hail from, and generate appropriately. The game also tracks the various different structures of the names – some name types have just one name, some have two, some have several with a mini-title in the middle, and so forth – and can always produce a “casual” version (i.e. “Mark” to “Mark Johnson” or whatever) as well as accurately reproducing a name when needed, without looking for name-segments where they don’t exist, or failing to look for a name segment relevant to a certain name archetype.

I have to say, I am *so* happy with how these look! They’re all very different, some speak to particular locations or cultural ideas, whilst others don’t, but they are all distinguishable. I’m still doing a little bit more work on these, but only a couple of hours’ work remains, and then in 0.8 everyone who you speak to will have their name highlighted. So, here is a rather splendid set of examples from a whole bunch of cultures in some playtesting world generations! Hope you like black-and-white images…

Names1 Names2 Names3 Names4 Names5 Names6 Names7 Names8 Names9 Names10 Names11 Names12

Names13 Names14 Names15

In the process I also had to develop the very start of the system for generating sets of animals and plants within particular climate zones. Plants were already present but were distributed across all biomes of a certain type (so northern tundra and southern tundra areas would have the same plants, somehow), and also tended to be colour-matched to their biome, which made a degree of sense but definitely reduced the kind of background/aesthetic interest they could potentially generate. Plants were therefore redone, and their naming conventions were also altered somewhat to reflect these changes (all of which come before visual generation at some later date when I have a spare couple of days). Animal generation has now appeared for the first time, and just like plants, they are tethered to a certain area of a certain biome – so the game finds a tile of desert, looks to see how far contiguous desert extends, and then all that desert has the same group of species. The species elsewhere, by contrast, will be completely different, even if they are also desert. Like plants, I’ll generate the images for these at some far-later date (since this isn’t exactly gameplay-essential stuff, just general background worldbuilding), but the names will be used in this release, as they serve to inform the name generation for individuals in certain nations, and they’ll also show up in artworks and literature and metaphors and the like later on. I also thought quite a bit about which animals I can realistically vary in appearance and name, so a few common animals aren’t in here because I couldn’t think of how to vary them well enough, whilst a couple of more obscure animals are present precisely because they vary a lot. Here are some animal/plant printouts, with their biome attached:


And then two massive printouts of all the plants/animals generated across a world, so you can get a full idea of the generation systems for these:



As for the bugs, I’ve reached the point where only two things remain for 0.8: sentence generation, and bugfixes. Sentence generation is such an intellectually complex task – although once I have a suitably complicated but usable and modifiable programming framework in place, I’m confident it will actually move quite quickly – that I need to spend a lot of time simply planning it out before I actually start coding it in. In this vein I’ve been scribbling ideas all over paper for the last week, and although it is taking a while, I am zeroing in on a workable method. Much like most things in URR, it will wind up being a balance between some structures and templates, entirely procedural elements, and then a range of variation within these aspcets based on the speaker producing the sentence – a soon-to-be-gigantic function called make_sentence has now been constructed, and so the only remaining task is to actually write the thing (ha!). As a result of this week’s focus on planning, however, on the actual coding front I’ve been working instead on bug fixing, in order to ensure that 0.8 is actually stable once I release it (hopefully at the end of July/start of August). Some of these were found from my own playtesting adventures, but a large number were submitted by the playtesting team I recruited a few months ago (thanks again, all of you!) and with these all fixed, I do actually feel fairly confident that every part of 0.8 (aside from speech/dialects/etc) is finished, bug-free, and ready to release. I can’t rule out the possibility that there are NPC-related problems I simply haven’t anticipated yet, but I haven’t run into any in quite some time, and everyone basically seems to behave correctly (though I’m going to have to revisit  NPCs in 0.9, of course, to implement the NPC classes that aren’t being included in the upcoming 0.8). Here’s a run-down:

  • Fortress guards no longer sometimes fail to move when they should exchange schedules with another guard.
  • Fortress merchants always appear correctly even if the player enters the grid part-way through their move from their home to their stall.
  • Fortress merchants are always assigned to the correct open-air stalls.
  • There cannot be two open-air stalls of the same sort within a single fortress, nor too many merchants for them to all be assigned a stall.
  • Slaves and servants in upper-class districts absolutely, definitely, without a doubt, always sleep in the correct places on the correct floors no matter how and when the player spawns the mansion and what other movements the player takes.
  • Drawbridge chains do, actually, appear, when the player looks at them.
  • Looking at certain doors in torture chambers or dungeons no longer causes the game to crash.
  • Looking at a small number of bars in torture chambers or dungeons no longer results in a black screen instead of the appropriate generated image.
  • NPCs are always the correct inverted colour when they pass under trees or a gate.
  • Handled some weirdness with players stepping through gates and sometimes winding up on the tile next to the gate, and sometimes winding up one gate further away.
  • Fixed an issue where you could read sections of the encyclopedia that should have been disabled.
  • Fixed an entirely aesthetic issue with some potential colour patterns on couches.
  • Resolved strange issue with a small subset of square-based castle generation outcomes that would position guard towers in the wrong orientation.

See you all next week for what might be quite a technical post about sentence generation!